The improvements for v5 indicate that things are moving in this direction, so hopefully this will continue. The software is not "broken" in a fundamental way, but a rethink of some facets of the interface and the implementation of standard DAW paradigms where appropriate (eg, record arming) is needed to bring it into line with modern expectations. On the plus side, MuLab seems stable, and there are neat touches like the adjustable pre/ post fader point. Even when you do, the interface feels idiosyncratic and long-winded alongside other DAWs, lacking much of the functionality we've come to expect. From the garish, chunky interface to the reliance on menus, it's an effort to get to grips with. Our overriding impression of MuLab 5 is that it feels like a product of another, simpler era. And there's no plugin delay compensation, which is forgiveable given the price, but without a simple track delay offset, you can't easily apply manual correction. Setting up to record audio is fiddly, involving a settings page rather than the one-click 'arm track' approach of other DAWs. "Our overriding impression of MuLab 5 is that it feels like a product of another, simpler era" You can't type in values for things like fader levels either. The default key assignments are lacking - for instance, you can't transpose MIDI via the usual method of selecting notes and using the up/ down cursor keys, and to access typical MIDI functions, you have to use the right-click menu's submenus (which have to be re-opened with a click each and every time).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |